On May 11, 2023, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”) issued a Frequently Asked Question (“FAQ”), which calls into question the use of “springing rights,” a broadly used instrument to expedite financings while complying with mandatory filing requirements.  The FAQ addresses the timing for when a filing must be made for a transaction triggering a mandatory filing.  Since implementation of the mandatory filing requirements, transaction parties have used springing or deferred rights to allow financings to proceed while those rights triggering a CFIUS filing are deferred or held in abeyance until after CFIUS clearance.

Background on CFIUS Mandatory Filing Requirements

CFIUS regulations require mandatory filings when (1) a foreign person acquires certain governance (including a board observer) or information rights in a business that develops, tests or produces critical technology in the United States, or (2) when a foreign government acquires 25% or more of the voting interest in a US business that develops critical technology in the United States, operates critical infrastructure in the United States or collects/maintains sensitive personal data of US citizens (i.e., is a “TID US Business”).

CFIUS mandatory filings must be made at least 30 days prior to the “completion date,” which is defined as the “earliest date upon which any ownership interest, including a contingent equity interest, is conveyed, assigned, delivered, or otherwise transferred to a person, or a change in rights that could result in a covered control transaction or covered investment occurs.” 31 C.F.R. § 800.206.

CFIUS FAQ

The FAQ clarifies that mandatory filings must be made before a transaction’s “completion date,” and the completion date is the earliest date upon which any equity interest, including contingent equity interest, is transferred.  The FAQ provides an example in which a foreign person acquires 25% equity with a deferred right to “control,” and notes that the filing must be made before the acquisition of the equity.  A 25% voting interest would, by itself, typically be considered “control” (e.g., a CFIUS triggering right). 

The FAQ leaves some uncertainty regarding the use of springing rights outside of the transfer controlling equity interests.  The FAQ does not address the second half of the “completion date” definition (as appears in § 800.206), which refers to “a change in rights.”  That part of the definition provides that the completion date is when “a change in rights” resulting in a covered transaction “occurs.”  Thus, it remains unclear whether the completion date for acquisition of a passive interest (e.g., 5% voting interest), combined with a deferred CFIUS triggering right (e.g., a board observer), would be at the time of the acquisition of the equity (which by itself is not a covered transaction), or only when the change in rights “occurs” after CFIUS clearance.

Author

Rod Hunter, a partner in the Washington, DC office, regularly advises on U.S. foreign investment regulation, including reviews conducted by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and procedures relating to mitigation of foreign ownership, control or influence (FOCI) under national industrial security regulations. He previously served as Special Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs and senior director for international economics at the National Security Council (NSC), the White House office that coordinates trade policy and supervises CFIUS. A recognized expert in the field, he has served as an expert witness on CFIUS in civil litigation and has testified before Congress during the legislative process leading to recent amendments to CFIUS’ authorizing legislation.

Author

Sylwia Lis is a partner in the Washington, DC office. She has extensive experience advising clients on national security reviews of foreign investments, including representation before the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). Sylwia also advises companies on US law relating to exports and reexports of commercial goods and technology (EAR), defense trade controls (ITAR), and trade sanctions (OFAC) - including licensing, regulatory interpretations, M&A due diligence and regulatory notifications (DDTC/ITAR notification process), compliance programs and enforcement matters.

Author

Lise Test is an of counsel in the Firm’s International Trade Group in Washington, DC and practices in the area of international trade regulation and compliance — with emphasis on US export control laws (Export Administration Regulations (EAR) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)), trade sanctions, and anti-boycott laws. Ms. Test advises clients on issues relating to product classifications, licensing, regulatory interpretations, risk assessments, enforcement actions, internal investigations and compliance audits, as well as the design, implementation, and administration of compliance programs. Ms. Test works regularly with companies across a wide range of industries, including the pharmaceutical/medical device, telecommunications, manufacturing, and technology sectors. She joined the Firm as a summer associate in 2007 and became a full-time associate in 2008. Prior to joining Baker McKenzie, Ms. Test served as a lawyer at the Danish Ministry of Defence.

Author

Callie is an Associate in Baker McKenzie's Washington, DC office in the International Commercial practice. She has experience advising on international trade law, particularly national security reviews of foreign investments and compliance with US export controls and trade and economic sanctions.

Author

Daniel Andreeff is an associate in the Firm’s International Trade practice group in Washington, DC. Prior to joining the Firm, he interned with the Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Author

Orfeh Vahabzadeh is an associate in the Washington, DC office where she is a member of the International Commercial Practice Group. Prior to joining Baker McKenzie as an associate, Orfeh worked as a summer associate in 2020. Orfeh also previously served as a political appointee for the White House at the US Department of Transportation.

Author

Alexandra Kumar is an Associate in Baker McKenzie, Washington, DC office. Alex’s practice focuses on international trade law, particularly compliance with US export controls, trade and economic sanctions, and anti-boycott laws. She also represents clients in national security reviews before the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).